In the rapidly evolving world of software development, no-code and low-code platforms have emerged as revolutionary tools, promising to democratize application development and empower those without traditional coding skills. It’s tightly connected to the constantly increasing demand for new solutions and apps, which is fueling the ongoing boom on those platforms – as they require zero to little coding knowledge and allow more and more entrepreneurs to create new digital products.

Currently, the no-code market is projected to be worth $52 billion by 2024, underscoring the significant growth and potential of these tools​​. However, as with any innovation, these platforms come with their own set of challenges and limitations. In this post, we delve into the significant drawbacks of no-code and low-code solutions, helping you navigate their complexities and prepare for product development in the long run.

Full code vs. low-code/no-code: understanding the differences

Full code development involves traditional programming, where developers write every line of code, offering maximum customization and control. This approach is ideal for complex, large-scale projects requiring specific functionalities and high levels of customization. 

On the other hand, low-code/no-code platforms provide a more accessible, user-friendly environment, where non-technical users can build applications using graphical user interfaces and pre-built components. While this approach significantly reduces development time and requires less technical knowledge, it often comes with limitations in terms of flexibility, scalability, and depth of customization.

The relationship between these two approaches is not mutually exclusive. Many organizations find a hybrid approach beneficial, where low-code/no-code platforms handle simpler, less critical parts of a project, while full code development takes care of complex, custom requirements. This hybrid model leverages the speed and ease of low-code/no-code solutions while maintaining the robustness and flexibility of full code development, offering a balanced solution for diverse software development needs.

Now, as you understand the differences between these solutions, let’s come back to the main topic of our article.

The top 5 drawbacks of using no-code and low-code tools

1. The challenges of team collaboration

Unlike traditional coding environments, no-code and low-code platforms often fall short in supporting effective team collaboration. The absence of standard mechanisms for change reviews, such as pull requests, can lead to conflicts and overwrites, especially when multiple people work on different parts of the same application. 

The lack of sophisticated version control and collaborative features can turn a project into a tangled mess, often referred to as "spaghetti code." Without robust communication and clear component management rules, maintaining coherence in team projects becomes a significant hurdle.

2. Developer experience and limitations

Current no-code and low-code tools are in their young stage, and their user experience often does not live up to the hype. These platforms typically fall into two categories: those with a user-friendly interface but limited customization options, and those offering extensive design possibilities but with a clunky and non-intuitive user interface

The disparity between the ease of use and the depth of functionality means developers often have to compromise either on the aesthetic or the usability front. Moreover, the lack of automated testing and the necessity for frequent manual refreshes can significantly hamper development efficiency.

3. Security concerns

Security is a paramount concern in software development, especially this year. And no-code/low-code platforms are no exception. While the platforms themselves might be secure, they do not inherently guarantee the security of the applications built on them. 

This is particularly problematic as these tools are marketed to non-technical users who may lack expertise in security best practices. The resulting applications can be vulnerable to even basic security threats. Furthermore, the inability to review changes at a granular level can exacerbate these security issues.

4. Vendor lock-in dilemma

A critical concern with no-code and low-code platforms is vendor lock-in. Most of these platforms do not offer access to the source code, making it nearly impossible to migrate applications to other platforms. This limitation forces businesses to either continue developing on the same platform or rebuild the application from scratch elsewhere, a decision that can have significant time and cost implications.

5. Scaling challenges

Lastly, scaling applications built on no-code and low-code platforms can be fraught with difficulties. These platforms often do not support development by larger teams, leading to bottlenecks in application growth. 

Additionally, the reliance on the platform to handle increased traffic and the rapid complexity growth in applications can make scaling up an arduous task. The limited scope for automated testing further complicates the scaling process, increasing the risk of errors in larger, more complex applications.


In conclusion, while no-code and low-code platforms present an innovative and accessible path to application development, they are not without their limitations. 

It's important to acknowledge that while low-code/no-code platforms can be particularly effective for validating an MVP, you must consider the scalability of your solution. There's a critical point where the inherent limitations of no-code may impact the user base due to stagnant development and subpar solution quality. 

Therefore, while these platforms are invaluable for rapid prototyping and less complex applications, for more advanced, scalable, and secure projects, transitioning to full code development is advisable to ensure long-term success and adaptability.

Did any of the issues described above ring a bell when thinking about your project? Make sure to drop us a line if you’re thinking about shifting from a low-code/no-code to a full code solution.